top of page

Where's The Loot Coming From To Sabotage Working Class Candidates In Democratic Primaries?

Max Berger, at More Perfect Union yesterday, worked to unravel the mystery behind the nearly $20 million in sewer money that was spent against progressive candidates-- mostly women of color-- by a small handful of right-wing "Jewish" SuperPACs whose goal is to defeat working class candidates. "Four well-financed super PACs," he wrote, "have spent over $18 million in just the past three months to help corporate-aligned Democrats maintain their control over the Democratic Party."

NC-04: Foushee v Allam- $3,689,364

NC-01: Davis v Smith- $2,909,656

PA-12: Irwin v Lee- $3,360,675

TX-28: Cuellar v Cisneros- $2,212,200

OR-05: Schrader v McLeod-Skinner- $800,921

MI-11: Stevens v Levin- $300,241

OH-11: Turner v Brown- $5,334,195

That comes to $18,607,254 from 5 interconnected shady outfits, 4 controlled by the AIPAC-Mellman network plus one of crypto-billionaire Sam Bankman-Fried's bizarre political operations. Last night I discussed this flood of campaign cash with a senior-- and very smart-- progressive congressman. He noted that many of his colleagues aren't taking the threat seriously enough. "$5 million in one race, and now $13 million in another. Honestly, it looks like the progressive movement is facing an existential threat."

Berger began with the crucial question: Who's funding them? The answer is unpleasant for progressive Jews to contemplate. "Much of the big money intervening against these working-class champions comes from AIPAC-affiliated donors, a right-wing lobby for Israel. These ads that AIPAC helps fund however, virtually never mention the word Israel. They route funding through two giant super PACs: the Democratic Majority for Israel and the United Democracy Project. All together, the two AIPAC-related super PACs have spent over $10 million in these seven races."

The United Democracy Project-- the biggest funder of this ad barrage-- proclaims to be engaged in efforts to strengthen democracies here and abroad. But, AIPAC PAC has also endorsed 109 Republicans who sided with the insurrectionists and voted against certifying the 2020 presidential election. So, a billionaire-funded super PAC that supports Republicans who objected to Electoral College results is creating ads saying working-class candidates of color aren’t real Democrats.
The United Democracy Project raised $15.7 million in the first quarter-- $8.5 million of that from AIPAC itself. Major individual donors to UDP in the first quarter included investor and media mogul Haim Saban, who donated $1 million; investors Michael Leffell and Linda Rubin, who each donated $500,000; investor Ed Levy, philanthropist Phil de Toledo, investor Tony Davis and financial analyst Victor Kohn, who each donated $250,000; and investor Kenneth Levy, who donated $200,000.
[Mark Mellman's] Democratic Majority for Israel is a super PAC founded by people tied to AIPAC that allows them to engage in Democratic primaries without AIPAC’s brand. Many of DMFI’s donors have also been affiliated with AIPAC. For example, Stacy Schusterman, the chairman of oil and gas company Samson Energy and DMFI PAC’s top donor this year with $2.5 million given, is a former AIPAC board member. Several DMFI board members have previously held positions with AIPAC or its affiliate the American Israel Education Fund, including co-chairs Ann Lewis and Todd Richman.
Mainstream Democrats' major Democratic donor Reid Hoffman has invested $500,000 into a new super PAC meant to beat back Democratic left-wing populists. Its website says it’s “the only Democratic group with the courage to consistently defend mainstream Democrats and defeat extreme candidates whose stated goal is “to overthrow” the Democratic Party.”
According to Puck News, “Mainstream Democrats shares staff, offices and other resources with another PAC that has gone after Turner, the Democratic Majority For Israel-- which, despite its name, has been focused on beating back liberals more broadly. Now, with a new brand and with Hoffman’s help, the group is going bigger.”
Recently, these groups have been joined by Protect Our Future, which gets much of its money from Sam Bankman-Fried, a crypto billionaire who is worth $24 billion. Protect Our Future says it’s concerned with vaccination preparedness, but many of the crypto billionaires are trying to cultivate positive relationships with lawmakers because they fear the potential of future crypto regulation. It’s spent $16 million dollars across all races this election cycle.
The billionaire funded super PACs have targeted candidates around the country who have been fighting for a working-class agenda: Jessica Cisernos in Laredo, Erica Smith and Nida Allam in North Carolina, Nina Turner in Cleveland, and Andy Levin in Michigan. They’ve also gone all out to help Kurt Schrader in Oregon. The super PACs see these candidates as threats to their control of the Democratic Party.
Their sharpest line of attack, which they’ve repeated in several races, is that working-class candidates are not real Democrats (again, coming from an organization which has endorsed 109 Republicans who refused to certify Biden’s election).

The same congressman mentioned above told me that, like standard Republican Party strategy, everything that comes out of these groups' messaging is grounded in projection. "Erica's opponent was the most conservative, anti-Choice Republican-friendly Democrat in the North Carolina legislature with a record to prove it. So the attack was to use that description against Erica... and they put enough money into repeating it that it confused voters enough to hand the nomination to someone you have described as to the right of Joe Manchin and Sinema."

The AIPAC candidate, Steve Irwin, is an actual Republican who, lately, calls himself a Democrat. This is one of the misleading ads the AIPAC network ran against Summer Lee, nearly derailing her campaign in an election still too close to call as of this morning (even if progressives have called the race for her already):

Berger wrote that last month "in an ad targeting Nina Turner, DMFI said, 'Nina Turner is back at it. Spreading lies and division. Turner refused to endorse Clinton over Trump.'... [T]hey are willing to use anything they can to stop working-class candidates from winning. They’ve spent a combined more than $2 million on ads to help the final remaining anti-choice Democrat in the house-- including one that calls Jessica Cisernos, an immigration attorney, 'a risk to our jobs and our safety.'"

He then dug down into the Democratic establisshment's cesspool of consultants to find who's putting all this Republican money laundered through AIPAC to work against working class candidates. "There are major players in the Democratic Party who are helping these super PACs take out working-class champions. Some of the most powerful and connected firms in Democratic politics are part of the effort to defeat working-class insurgents."

Waterfront Strategies Inc
SKDKnickerbocker LLC
Trilogy Interactive
Mellman Group
Dover Strategy Group
Adbeat Strategies LLC
The ads were produced by a firm called Waterfront Strategies, which is the media production wing of a firm called GMMB. It’s the biggest media production company in Democratic Party politics. In 2020, Democrats paid the firm $632,064,023. Why is the biggest firm in Democratic politics helping a former Republican staffer defeat a progressive woman of color?
SKDK has produced ads for the United Democracy Project. One of its leaders, Anita Dunn, was a top staffer in President Biden’s 2020 victory who worked in his administration before returning to her company last summer. According to the Washington Post, “the firm has served a sprawling roster of high-powered clients in recent years, including Fortune 500 companies like AT&T and Pfizer.” Politico recently reported that SKDK was working for Starbucks while the company was engaged in heinous union-busting and only recently terminated the relationship.
It was paid tens of millions of dollars in 2020 for its work with the Democratic Party of Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Nevada, Virginia, New Hampshire, Ohio, Iowa and Nebraska.
DMFI is run by Mark Mellman, who also runs the Mellman Group. It has contracts with the DCCC, DSCC, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, and several conservative Democrats in Congress.

On Tuesday, Bernie sent a letter to the lobbyist and corporate whore Biden put in charge of the DNC, Jaime Harrison, calling on the DNC to ban super PAC money from the party’s primaries. It's worth reading:

4 comentarios

crapper says, "Did anyone except the previous responder note that the PARTY seems to appreciate all the help?" The answer is yes. Many, many times here and at TYT, Stephanie Miller, and even on MSNBC to mention a few.


Me gusta

19 may 2022

Is it ironic that the AIPAC-aligned billionaire-funded SPACS are shilling for nazis?

Do they favor nazis simply because trump moved the embassy to Jerusalem? Are they that single/simple-minded? Certainly, they know that the democrap PARTY will continue to smother progressive thought/candidates, no matter how many or few they allow to be elected.

Did anyone except the previous responder note that the PARTY seems to appreciate all the help?

Me gusta

In 2016 and 2020, my favored presidential candidate and his supporters were continually derided for their race and gender by the institutional party. I recall hearing the term "Berniebros" on occasion.

In 2022, white guys like Mellman pumped $3.3M into PA-12 to support a white guy against an A-A woman in a contested primary. Said white guy, BTW, is a "union avoidance" attorney:

The institutional party is totally down with that. I utterly despise the institutional party.

Me gusta
19 may 2022
Contestando a

then quit voting for it.

Me gusta
bottom of page