top of page

If You're Ever Asked To Name The 5 Most Fascist Members Of Congress, Don’t Forget Scott Perry (R-PA)

Corrupt Party Hack Hakeem Jeffries Backs Perry, Not America or Democracy

I hope you’re not one of the people Salon referred to yesterday in this headline: The rise of Rep. Scott Perry: The most dangerous insurrectionist you've never heard of. Perry is an odious character DWT has been sounding the alarm on him for a long time. And last year, we urged folks in Pennsylvania’s Dauphin, Cumberland and York counties to oust Perry and replace him with Democrat Shamaine Daniels. She even managed to win in Dauphin but the red tide in socially backward York was just too much for her and, in the end, Perry was reelected 169,331 (53.8%) to 145,215 (46.2%).

The redrawn boundaries of PA-10 had made it slightly easier for Perry to win. A district with an R+8 partisan lean, went to R+9 as more voters in York County were added to the district. It didn’t help that Perry outspent her $2,942,589 to $404,374 and that the DCCC ignored the race entirely, while the House Freedom Caucus poured over $830,000 into the race.

Like many right-wing ideologues, Perry voted against sending Pennsylvanians stimulus checks, was one of only 21 extreme right Republicans in Congress who voted against honoring law enforcement officers, worked to throw out Pennsylvanians’ votes and to this day continues to lie about the election, while all the while spewing racist white nationalist talking points. So maybe claiming Democrats are Nazis, as he does, shouldn't come as too big a surprise to anyone following his miserable career.

Rae Hodge’s scoop in Salon, though was that “Last week, a bipartisan group of lawmakers— including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, of New York, and Republican House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, of California— voted unanimously to prevent the Justice Department from accessing Perry's cell phone contents in its wider probe of Donald Trump's 2020 election-subversion efforts. That's only the latest turn of good luck for the embattled Perry, who's fought the DOJ's effort since the FBI seized his cell phone last August. On Jan. 5, a three-judge appeals court panel— including two Trump appointees— put a hold on a lower court's ruling, delaying DOJ access further. But the House's latest move to back Perry against the DOJ highlights the fact that, unlikely as this may seem, both the far-right House Freedom Caucus he now leads and the Democrats he views as his sworn enemies paved the way for his rise to power.”

It seems improbable now that Perry, whose record of wide-swinging claims goes back well before 2020, could have climbed the party ranks so quickly.
Perry once recklessly suggested, on live air, that ISIS was responsible for the 2018 mass shooting in Las Vegas. On another occasion, he accused then-CNN host Chris Cuomo of fabricating the extent of devastation in Puerto Rico following Hurricane Maria in 2017.
In a 2017 town hall meeting, Perry reportedly once blamed pollution on the almighty. While defending proposed budget cuts to the Environmental Protection Agency, Perry criticized the agency's Chesapeake Bay cleanup plans, claiming only certain polluters were targeted while other culprits were unfairly ignored.
"If you are spiritual and you believe in God, one of the violators was God because the forests were providing a certain amount of nitrates and phosphates to the Chesapeake Bay," he said.
That claim, unsurprisingly, was debunked by experts who note that water-side trees provide pollution runoff protection. But his divine deflection may have been less surprising to his constituents.
Perry was running his family's business, Hydrotech Mechanical Services, in 2002 when the company was caught dumping sewage sludge onto the banks of Stony Run Creek in south-central Pennsylvania. The state charged Perry with altering chemical-monitoring documents and he narrowly avoided a felony conviction. Instead, his company paid a $5,000 fine and Perry completed the state's Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition in what he called a "last-minute, at-the-courtroom deal that was never supposed to happen, but it did."
It wouldn't be the last time Perry would face accusations of hiding evidence.
In the months after Trump's 2020 electoral defeat, former chief of staff Mark Meadows kept his office fireplace well-kindled. The fire was lit first thing in the morning by staff, his former aide testified, then heaped with logs throughout the day. And every so often, Meadows would walk over to his fireplace, remove its covering, and throw a few documents into the fire.
Meadows had been the chair of the House Freedom Caucus until 2019, a post Perry now holds, and the two men knew each other well. Perry had begun having meetings with Meadows that December, the aide said, arriving with physical papers and PowerPoint presentations to discuss former Vice President Mike Pence's role in certifying the 2020 election results— and what Perry "believed could happen on Jan. 6."
Eventually, Perry brought a few others to meet with Meadows, the aide said. With the fireplace lit and a room full of warm bodies, Meadows left his office door propped open. The aide saw Perry and the others inside, and saw Meadows again burning documents.
Perry's spokesman has denied he was ever part of these discussions, citing a Jan. 6 tweet from the congressman condemning the violence at the Capitol. But just hours after the attack, Perry joined other Republicans on the House floor in a failed attempt to prevent his own state's electoral votes from being counted. Perry would then spend months parroting Trump's baseless claims of election theft, arguing that Pennsylvania's 7 million votes should be thrown out.
Ultimately, the same aide who saw Perry leave Meadows' office amid the presumed or apparent destruction of documents would testify that Perry was among several members of Congress who had asked for her help in securing a preemptive presidential pardon. Perry has denied this, although not under oath.
Eventually, members of the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 events developed a clearer picture of Perry's role in Trump's failed bid to overturn the 2020 election results.
In a trove of texts leaked in December 2022, Perry and Meadows' 2020 exchanges surfaced, illuminating an array of schemes and outlandish notions aimed at reversing Trump's defeat. Perry sent YouTube conspiracy-theory videos about election-meddling Italian satellites, asking Meadows why the Italian government couldn't help the group's cause. Perry suggested seizing voting machines with a "cyber forensic team" after the election, and putting them under lock and key.
Perry went on to urge Meadows to get Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen replaced with a Trump-friendly figure in the DOJ, Jeffrey Clark. After Trump ordered Rosen to declare the election corrupt, Rosen refused. Trump responded by threatening to replace Rosen with Clark, who'd concocted a plan to help overturn the election results, but the then-president backed down from after a fiery meeting where several DOJ officials and Trump's own White House counsel, Pat Cipollone, threatened to quit in response. Those exchanges are now part of the reason the DOJ wants access to Perry's cell phone contents.
But back in July of 2022, House Oversight Committee members knew significantly less about Perry's role. They subpoenaed Perry, who responded by denying the legitimacy of the committee he now sits on, and refused to testify.
The committee's chair at the time, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) had the authority to file contempt charges against Perry. But as CNN's Manu Raju reported, Raskin seemed to have "little appetite to refer House Republicans who defy subpoenas to DOJ on contempt charges— saying it could lead to 'wild goose chases.'
"I don't know that Congress can take a member of Congress to court under the speech or debate clause," Raskin said, referring to Perry's defense that his cell phone conversations were immune from collection. "But our point here is not to come up with, you know, a dozen new dazzling theories to end up in a lot of wild goose chases all over the land."
"Our point is to bring back a report to the American people to Congress about what happened to us," Raskin told Raju.
Rather than facing contempt charges, Perry was referred to the House Ethics Committee, along with other members who refused to obey subpoena orders. But with a Republican majority in the House and Kevin McCarthy holding the speaker's gavel, both the Ethics Committee and the House ethics review office have become partisan chokepoints.
These days, Raskin sees Trump's indictment as imminent.
"We think there will be charges probably on some things we didn't even have, because we don't have all of the prosecutorial resources that the Department of Justice has, and so we think they probably collected a lot more evidence than we got," he told MSNBC on Friday.
Even if Raskin's prediction is correct, Perry's role in Trump's Jan. 6 plans may remain under a shroud of congressional secrecy. The party whose subpoenas he once dodged now, for its own reasons, has Perry's back in his tug-of-war with the DOJ.
On Feb. 23, the DOJ will get its chance to ask an appeals court in Washington for access to Perry's phone contents. House Democratic leaders will once again fight to keep Perry's evidence from coming out at all.

7 commentaires

13 févr. 2023

To gain a bit of perspective, since all this shit has been normalized a little at a time over 40 years...

put yourself back in the time of the 1960 election. If you're too young, just go back to 1976. If you're too young for that, just understand that you've never lived during a single sane political year in the history of this shithole.

imagine how ridiculous the republican party would have looked if they'd have sported the slate of pure feces that they dropped onto the voters from 2016 on (it's been since 1980, but use 2016 to keep it simpler).

then imagine just how fetid the democraps would have had to have been to LOSE to any of…

14 févr. 2023
En réponse à

yes. and my point is that, as the nazis get worser and worser, your democraps STILL can't beat them with any sort of regularity.

ask me, it says much more about the democraps.


Dems lost House elections by roughly 3M votes in aggregate to the party of "Italian Satellites", "Chinese Thermostats", and "Jewish Space Lasers." They lost to George Santos and to Anna Paulina Luna. These results have been subsequently spun as a "victory."


13 févr. 2023

more anecdotal proof that nazis are... nazis, and democraps are pussies, who REFUSE to do "merrick garland" about anything and anyone.

gawd what a shithole.

14 févr. 2023
En réponse à

like 80 million fewer? You seem to believe that what the democraps "attempt" is a genuine effort. I see them as calculated performances meant to reassure their idiot voters that, even though they never do shit, they still mean well. a lie.

I see Bernie et al just proposed new lege to expand SSI benefits. If they really wanted to *DO* it and not just pretend to care, they coulda done in 2009 or 2021. But they didn't. They do it now when they know damn well it won't pass.

bottom of page