Patrick Svitek, who works for the Washington Post now, covered politics for the Texas Tribune for the last decade; he knows what the right-wing’s war on democracy is all about. The attacks on democracy from the Republican Party haven’t been as successful as the nationalist far right in India— Modi’s fascist Bharatiya Janata Party— have, where democracy is all but undermined and discarded. But Texas will be one of the first places to “catch up” with India… or electoral autocracies like Zimbabwe, Venezuela or Belarus.
Yesterday, Svitek wrote about the growing number of Republican politicians following Trump’s example in refusing to commit to accepting 2024 election results. Svitek raises the immediate concern that “the country could see a repeat of the violent aftermath of Trump’s loss four years ago,” but there are also great longer term consequences, structural concerns from increased erosion of trust in democratic institutions to the kind of increased polarization— best represented by egoist politicians like Trump and Marjorie Traitor Greene— who are unconcerned that their partisan actions will make it impossible to find common ground and work towards constructive solutions to societal challenges, This destabilization, undermining governance and disrupting public order, is precisely why Putin has supported Trump’s efforts, something an ignoramus like Traitor Greene isn’t capable of grokking. I worry that this kind of preemptive rejection of election results is a tactic associated with authoritarian regimes seeking to maintain or seize power. When the GOP adopts this kind of rejectionist rhetoric, it normalizes illiberal, even authoritarian, behavior, weakening democratic norms and making it easier for future MAGA leaders to further erode whatever undermine democratic principles remain.
In MAGA world, wrote Svitek, “The question has become something of a litmus test, particularly among the long list of possible running mates for Trump… In a vivid recent example, Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) was pressed at least six times in a TV interview Sunday on whether he would accept this November’s results. He repeatedly declined to do so, only saying he was looking forward to Trump being president again. He continued to evade the question even as the interviewer, NBC News’s Kristen Welker, reminded him that a ‘hallmark of our democracy is that both candidates agree to a peaceful transfer of power.’” His ugly response should be completely disqualifying for him not just as a possible VP candidate but to even continue as a senator: “This is why so many Americans believe that NBC is an extension of the Democrat party at the end of the day… I believe that President Trump will be our next president. It’s that simple.”
Eric Wilson, the progressive candidate in the western Wisconsin swing district (WI-03) occupied by Derrick Van Orden, told us yesterday that “Van Orden was among the thousands of people who went to Washington for the ‘Stop the Steal’ rally headlined by then-President Donald Trump on Jan. 6, 2021. Afterward, Van Orden was photographed on or near the grounds of the U.S. Capitol, where rioters violently breached the building in one of American democracy’s darkest days. When voting for the speaker this past fall, Van Orden had every opportunity to embrace a bipartisan governing coalition, but chose to enable his far-right, election denying colleagues instead. Unlike Derrick, I will bring stability, transparency, and a pragmatic approach to this office. You will not find me drunkenly screaming at young people and tromping around the capital being a bully. I will stand by the oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. To rebuild trust in our system we need level headed people who can have disagreements and still work things out. Derrick has proven that’s not him, he hasn’t stood by any of his commitments. If he’s willing to be an insurrectionist once, we can believe he would be one again.” If you’d like to help Eric replace Van Orden, please consider a contribution on the Flip Congress ActBlue page.
The refusal to commit to accept elections results is “deeply concerning,” said Steven Levitsky, a government professor at Harvard University who studies democracy around the world. “Accepting the results of elections is in effect the cardinal rule of democracy. It is the first rule of democratic politics. If a major party is not willing to accept defeat in elections, democracy cannot be stable.”
Trump’s push to overturn the 2020 election— and his conduct around the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol— is now at the center of two of the four criminal cases that he faces as he undertakes a comeback campaign.
…Trump has continued to falsely claim that the 2020 election was rigged and that he won states that he did not win, such as Wisconsin.
Trump also has suggested he may not accept the results of the next election, including in an interview with the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that was published last week.
“If everything’s honest, I’ll gladly accept the results. I don’t change on that,” Trump told the newspaper. “If it’s not, you have to fight for the right of the country.”
Furthermore, in recent interviews with Time magazine, Trump did not rule out the possibility of political violence if he loses again. While he said he did not think there would be violence, he added that it “always depends on the fairness of the election.”
And in a TV interview Tuesday with a Pennsylvania station, Trump downplayed the events of Jan. 6, said he did not regret disputing the 2020 election results and urged people to “follow your heart” in challenging elections.
President Biden, in an interview with CNN aired Wednesday night, said that if he wins the November election, Trump will not admit defeat.
“You can’t only love your country when you’re winning,” Biden said, adding: “He may not accept the outcome of the election. I promise you he won’t.”
“I think the potential for another Jan. 6 is there,” Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS), who chaired the House select committee that examined the attack on the Capitol, told CBS News this week. “The majority of the people who orchestrated Jan. 6 are now saying, in so many words, ‘I’m not certain that I will accept the findings of the 2024 election.’”
Trump has made the recent comments while facing little pushback from Republicans in Congress or those potentially angling to be his running mate.
North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum, in a TV interview Sunday, dodged a question about Trump’s comments on political violence. Burgum, like Scott, declined to contemplate a scenario in which the former president loses and said he was “looking forward to next January, when Vice President Harris certifies the election for Donald Trump.”
The White House has emphasized that Biden will accept the 2024 results, while his reelection campaign has repeatedly criticized Trump and his allies for continuing to sow doubt about the legitimacy of elections in America.
…Polling shows voters— especially Republicans— are far from confident in American democracy as the next presidential election nears. A Quinnipiac University survey from March found that voters were almost evenly divided on whether they thought the U.S. system of democracy was working, with a large majority of Republicans saying it was not.
Asked how confident they were that votes will be counted accurately in November, two-thirds of voters overall said they were “very” or “somewhat” confident. That number dropped to 45 percent among Republicans.
Election denialism continues to permeate the national GOP, which went through a Trump-backed takeover earlier this year.
The Washington Post reported in March that those applying for jobs at the Republican National Committee were asked in job interviews if they thought the 2020 election was stolen. And more recently, the RNC’s top lawyer, Charlie Spies, resigned amid a rift with Trump over Spies’s past criticism of Trump, including over his false claims about the 2020 election.
“Great news for the Republican Party,” Trump said Sunday on his Truth Social platform. “RINO lawyer Charlie Spies is out as Chief Counsel of the RNC. I wish him well!”
The GOP’s desire to appease Trump’s fixation on 2020 now appears to loom over his search for a running mate. He has talked about having many options and is expected to make a decision closer to the Republican National Convention, which is scheduled for mid-July.
Trump has singled out Scott as an especially helpful rival turned surrogate, joking that he has made a better case for Trump than he ever did for himself.
Scott and Burgum are not the only possible Trump running mates who have evaded questions about the potential aftermath of the 2024 election. Rep. Elise Stefanik (NY), the No. 4 Republican in the House, would not commit in January to voting to certify the 2024 results as a member of Congress.
“We will see if this is a legal and valid election,” Stefanik told NBC News, citing efforts that were pending at the time to remove Trump from the primary ballot in a handful of states over his role in the Jan. 6 attack.
…Another potential Trump vice-presidential candidate, Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL), declined in March to say whether he would certify the 2028 election results if he were vice president.
“If you have state officials who are violating the election law in their states … then no, I would not,” Donalds said at an Axios event.
Some of the possible vice-presidential candidates have previously taken positions at odds with Trump’s push to overturn the 2020 election. Scott, for example, voted in the Senate to certify the 2020 results— hours after the Jan. 6 attack— and said during a presidential primary debate last year that Pence “absolutely” did the right thing on Jan. 6.
Michael Miller, a political science professor at George Washington University who studies democracy, said Republicans like Scott are “clearly angling to be the VP, so they need to adopt the preferred rhetoric of Trump.” Regardless of whether they believe what they are saying, Miller added, “it’s very corrosive to democracy.”
“This is how democracies break down,” Miller said, later adding, “It’s such a low bar to say, ‘Yeah, the election is free and fair,’ or, ‘I will obey the results of the election.’ … You don’t deserve credit for not committing a crime.”
Asked last week about Trump’s refusal to promise to accept the election results, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said Biden is “committed to the rule of law and protecting American democracy,” reiterating he “will accept the will of the American people.”
