top of page

When Does McCarthy Get Out Of The Way And Allow Congress To Be Sworn In & Start Working?

I think it would be better for everyone if the clerk just asked anyone who wants to change their vote from any of the last 8 votes to just speak up. David Frum thinks something else would be better for everyone: McCarthy losing. In his Atlantic column yesterday, No Tears For Kevin McCarthy, he wrote that a McCarthy defeat will be better for Congress, better for the U.S. and better for the GOP. He is certain that “the House will function better under another speaker than it would under McCarthy— even if that other speaker is much more of an ideological extremist than McCarthy himself.

“McCarthy,” he wrote, “deserves to be in trouble because he refused to protect the institution he now seeks to lead. After the January 6, 2021, insurrection, he told fellow Republicans that he would urge President Donald Trump to resign immediately. When that vow became public, McCarthy denied he had ever made it, until a contemporaneous audio recording exposed his lie. ‘I’ve had it with this guy,’ McCarthy said after the January 6 attack— then voted in the impeachment proceedings to protect this guy. Eight days after Trump left office, McCarthy flew to Florida for a photo opportunity with the ex-president who had sent a mob to rampage through the Capitol and harm, abduct, or do worse to McCarthy’s own colleagues. Trump then released a statement boasting that he and McCarthy would be working closely together into the future, a statement McCarthy never contradicted. McCarthy then enabled and supported a purge of every House Republican who had acted with the integrity that he himself had failed to muster. He endorsed the primary opponent to Liz Cheney. He stripped committee assignments from Republicans who served on the committee to investigate the Capitol riot he had once condemned and now condoned. For weeks after January 6, McCarthy denied that he’d telephoned Trump that day to blame him for the attack. When then– Representative Jaime Herrera Beutler exposed his denials as false, McCarthy brutally rebuked her.”

Sadly, the 20 or so Republicans voting against McCarthy are not exacting retribution for his cravenness toward Trump. It’s not easy to discern what exactly they are exacting retribution for. They do not seem to have noteworthy policy disagreements with McCarthy. Their rebellions seem aimed instead at enhancing their own power within the caucus. They are hostage-takers whose chief demand is to keep holding their hostage forever.
…McCarthy has been frantically signaling for Democratic rescue. Speakers are elected by a majority of the representatives. If enough Democrats were to absent themselves, McCarthy could be elected speaker by the roughly 200 Republicans who do back him. But what’s the affirmative case for such rescue?
If McCarthy becomes speaker now, he will be a weak and precarious one— constantly at the mercy over the next two years of those 20-odd fringe Republicans voting against him this week. McCarthy will appease and accommodate them. When John Boehner was speaker, he dealt with the irreconcilable fringe by building majorities across the aisle. The 2015 budget deal that ended that year’s debt-ceiling crisis passed the House with only 174 Republican votes, augmented by 95 Democratic votes to reach the necessary 218 majority. But if McCarthy survives his present leadership test, he’ll do so only by committing never to repeat Boehner’s example. That commitment will have teeth, too, because McCarthy has reportedly agreed to allow any single disaffected Republican to call for a vote of confidence in his speakership if he displeases them. He has proposed to escape his immediate hostage crisis by handing himself over as a hostage forever.
That’s the beginning of the reason it would be better if he failed to win the speakership. If McCarthy somehow ekes out a win, he will be broken from the beginning— an officeholder who holds only the office, not the power of the office.
A speaker of the House who does not speak for a majority of the House is a waste of time and space. He speaks for nobody, he acts for nobody, and there’s no point in negotiating with him. Seeking a decision from him will be like seeking a decision from the president of Lebanon, when everybody knows that it’s actually Hezbollah who controls the guns and money, and is the power in the land. To have to deal directly with Hezbollah is unlovely, but more practical and probably safer, with less room for misunderstanding along the way.
It would be better to have a speaker who can deliver than one who cannot, even if that speaker is more ideological than McCarthy. An ideologue can say “Yes” and have it mean something; a speaker who does not command a majority cannot.
A McCarthy speakership is a formula for parliamentary paralysis, for rule by a minority faction within the majority caucus, for crisis after crisis after crisis. Rejection of McCarthy by an agitated minority may paradoxically make it easier for the rest of the system to function with the post-McCarthy Republican majority.
By electing a more ideological speaker, Republicans may inadvertently shape a less ideological House majority. Imagine what this House will look like after a McCarthy defeat. Twenty Republican House members will have exposed 200 colleagues to national ridicule for reasons that even those 20 insurgents cannot coherently explain. Are the 200 now likely to follow the 20 into a fight to default on the U.S. debt? To slash American aid to Ukraine and hand the advantage to Russian President Vladimir Putin? To try to impeach President Joe Biden over some QAnon fantasy? To devote the next Congress to waging war on the FBI and other law-enforcement agencies? Or will they more likely say, “That’s enough from you— you have embarrassed us one time too many”?
The coverage of this speaker election has tended to present the spectacle as a failure and a hazard. But maybe what we’re seeing is a system working for the better. An unworthy man could be about to lose a job he lacks the talent and character to do. The radical crew who aimed to exclude the unworthy man imagine that they will be empowered by their rebellion. Instead, their destructive action will only have discredited them with their peers.
New House Republican leadership must be found. Although that leadership may be more ideologically extreme than McCarthy, it may also learn from this week’s debacle to be more careful about launching crazy adventures—and thus be more able to negotiate and deliver deals.
Ditch McCarthy. He won’t be missed.


3 comentarios

It's fitting that this is happening on the 2d anniversary of J-6. The same forces that were unleashed then are institutionalized in a house of Congress now--at least for the next 2 years.

The hard right in the GOP caucus pushed their agenda in ways that were never considered by what passes for the left in the Dem caucus. I have little to add to Ian Welsh now:

You have power if you’re willing to use it. The “Squad” is a joke because when they have leverage, they don’t use it. They don’t really believe in their own ideology: they don’t think they have the right to force other Democrats to govern better.

Republican right wingers, as much as I…

Me gusta
07 ene 2023
Contestando a

your comment is salient but still undersells the culpability of the democraps.

Indeed, the nazis (treasonous insurrectionists) ARE "institutionalized in a house of Congress now (and forever). WHY?? BECAUSE your democraps refused to *DO* "merrick garland" every. single. time. they had majorities with evil to undo. REFUSED. From refusing to put nixon up against a wall in '68 to refusing to even try to unseat insurrectionists from congress and put trump et al up against a wall.

pelo$i needs to be well down the list of all $peakers and at the very bottom of all democrap/Democrat speakers for this reason alone as well as the reasons you mentioned.

finally, if someone (like, say, AOC) claims to hold a principle dear...…

Me gusta

07 ene 2023

holy shit. coming from a democrap evangelist, this is ... fucking insane!

1) this isn't the democrap party, where losing closely is considered a victory. he's lost, what, 11 swings already. LOST... as in did not win.

2) you think the 200 who keep voting for this pos won't turn around and go along with every impeachment, committee investigating whatever, purging of your precious democraps from committees, passing national bans on abortion and marriage equality, gutting or eliminating SSI, Medicare and Medicaid, shutting down the government.... no matter who they (and your fucking democrap fascists) end up electing as speaker? are you fucking nuts?

3) every time you avoid evil... you only end up with eviler. that is the america…

Me gusta
bottom of page