top of page
Search

The Senate Passed A Shameful, Bloated War Budget-- And Most Democrats Voted For It-- Not Bernie



Yesterday, the Senate passed it’s version of the war budget 86-11. Among the 11 votes against it were Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, Jeff Merkley, Ed Markey… Earlier in the day, Bernie’a amendment to reduce miliary spending by 10% was rejected 88-11. Ten progressives + GOP crackpot Rand Paul voted against the bill.


It should come as no surprise that Democrats fatted by the Military Industrial Complex— from Manchin, Carper and Schumer to Warner, Hassan and Feinstein— would vote against it, but how do Democrats who call themselves progressives look at themselves in the mirror? We can all be disappointed with Sherrod Brown (OH), Cory Booker (NJ), Warnock (GA), Mazie Hirono (HI), John Fetterman (PA), Sheldon Whitehouse (RI), Padilla (CA), Brian Schatz (HI). The 10 Democrats who earned the right to call themselves progressives:

  • Tammy Baldwin (WI)

  • Ed Markey (MA)

  • Jeff Merkley (OR)

  • Chris Murphy (CT)

  • Bernie (VT)

  • Tina Smith (MN)

  • Chris Van Hollen (MD)

  • Elizabeth Warren (MA)

  • Peter Welch (VT)

  • Ron Wyden (OR)

Now the Senate will hash out the final bill with the House, which added all it’s crazy culture war amendments (anti-Choice, anti-LGBTQ, anti-diversity and inclusion… all their pet peeves du jour except Hunter Biden’s penis.


Bernie explained his no vote on the bloated spending bill in a Guardian OpEd on Monday— and it was all about the enormous problems the country faces contrasted with a proposed military budget that would increase defense spending by $28 billion to over $886 billion, an all-time record, over $900 billionn if you include nuclear weapons spending through the Department of Energy.


As a result of climate change our planet is experiencing unprecedented and rising temperatures. Along with the rest of the world, we need to make major investments to transform our energy system away from fossil fuels and into more efficient and sustainable energy sources, or the life we leave our kids and future generations will become increasingly unhealthy and precarious.
Our healthcare system is broken. While the insurance companies and the pharmaceutical industry make hundreds of billions in profit, 85 million Americans are uninsured or underinsured, our life expectancy is declining, and we have a massive shortage of doctors, nurses, mental health practitioners and dentists.
Our educational system is teetering. While we have one of the highest rates of childhood poverty of almost any major country, millions of parents cannot find affordable and quality childcare. The number of our young people who graduate from college is falling behind many other countries and 45 million Americans are struggling under the weight of student debt.
Our housing stock is totally inadequate. While gentrification is causing rents to soar in many parts of our country some 600,000 Americans are homeless, and 18 million are spending more than half of their limited incomes on housing.
These are some of the crises our country faces. And we’re not dealing with them.
…I will oppose this bloated defense budget and efforts to further increase military spending through a defense supplemental for three main reasons.
First, more military spending is unnecessary. The $886 billion in defense spending agreed in the debt ceiling deal matches the Pentagon’s budget request and is more than sufficient to protect the United States and our allies. The United States spends more than three times what China spends on its military. This record high defense spending would come in spite of the end of the war in Afghanistan and despite the fact that the United States spends more on the military than the next 10 countries combined, most of whom are allies.
Second, the Pentagon cannot keep track of the dollars it already has, leading to massive waste, fraud and abuse in the sprawling military-industrial complex. The Pentagon accounts for about two-thirds of all federal contracting activity, obligating more money every year than all civilian federal agencies combined. Yet the Department of Defense (DOD) remains the only major federal agency that cannot pass an independent audit. Last year, the department was unable to account for over half of its assets, which are in excess of $3.1trillion. The Government Accountability Office (Gao) reports that DOD still cannot accurately track its finances or post transactions to the correct accounts. Each year, auditors find billions of dollars in the Pentagon’s proverbial couch cushions; in fiscal year 2022, navy auditors found $4.4 billion in untracked inventory, while the air force identified $5.2 billion worth of variances in its general ledger. A serious effort to address this waste should be undertaken before Congress throws more money at the Pentagon.
Third, much of this additional military spending will go to line the pockets of hugely profitable defense contractors— it is corporate welfare by a different name. Almost half of the Pentagon budget goes to private contractors, some of whom are exploiting their monopoly positions and the trust granted them by the United States to line their pockets. Repeated investigations by the DOD inspector general, the GAO and CBS News have uncovered numerous instances of contractors massively overcharging DOD, helping boost these companies’ profits to nearly 40%— and sometimes as high as 4,451%— while costing US taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars. TransDigm, Lockheed Martin, Boeing and Raytheon are among the offenders, dramatically overcharging the taxpayer while reaping enormous profits, seeing their stock prices soar and handing out massive executive compensation packages. Last year, Lockheed Martin received $46 billion in unclassified federal contracts, returned $11 billion to shareholders through dividends and stock buybacks, and paid its CEO $25 million a year. TransDigm, the company behind the 4,451% markup, touted $3.1 billion in profits on $5.4 billion of net sales, almost boasting to investors about just how fully it was fleecing the taxpayer. The fact that a share of the profits from these lucrative contracts will flow back to the congressional backers of higher defense budgets in the form of campaign contributions— America’s unique system of legalized bribery— makes the whole situation even more unconscionable.
Let’s be clear. Defending the American people is not only about pouring money into the Pentagon. It’s about making sure our children go to good schools and will have a habitable planet when they get older. It’s about making sure that every American has a decent standard of living and can enjoy quality healthcare and affordable housing.
As a nation, the time is long overdue for fundamental changes to our national priorities. Cutting military spending is a good first step.

Wilfred Owen

Dulce et Decorum est


Bent double, like old beggars under sacks, Knock-kneed, coughing like hags, we cursed through sludge, Till on the haunting flares we turned our backs And towards our distant rest began to trudge. Men marched asleep. Many had lost their boots But limped on, blood-shod. All went lame; all blind; Drunk with fatigue; deaf even to the hoots Of tired, outstripped Five-Nines that dropped behind.


Gas! Gas! Quick, boys!— An ecstasy of fumbling, Fitting the clumsy helmets just in time; But someone still was yelling out and stumbling And flound'ring like a man in fire or lime... Dim, through the misty panes and thick green light, As under a green sea, I saw him drowning.


In all my dreams, before my helpless sight, He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning.


If in some smothering dreams you too could pace Behind the wagon that we flung him in, And watch the white eyes writhing in his face, His hanging face, like a devil's sick of sin; If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs, Obscene as cancer, bitter as the cud Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues,— My friend, you would not tell with such high zest To children ardent for some desperate glory, The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est Pro patria mori.


Wilfred Owen wrote this condemnation of war in 1917 while he was serving in the British Army in France. It was published, posthumously, in 1920 and is still considered one of the greatest anti-war poems ever written. Owen was killed in action on November 4 1918, age 25, a week before the war's end. I hope you already know who Bob Dylan is, but if you don't... this is a good way to meet him; be my guest. Stay woke.



154 views

2 Comments


Guest
Jul 29, 2023

The numbers are surprising. Usually, when the Ds do their duty for their donors, they at least make an effort to appear to be reluctant to do so. I would have expected the numbers to be more like 61-37. Their obvious enthusiasm for war is troubling if not all that surprising.


I guess they know that their voters just don't care anymore.

Like

Guest
Jul 28, 2023

Pretending that Bernie is a sincerely progressive figure because he voted among a tiny minority twice, each a charade of a pretense of being a sincere progressive.

What Bernie and just a few others did was provide the tiny exception that always proves the rule -- rule #1) the money SHALL be served with the purest fidelity.


In short, Those folks were ALLOWED to vote in such a way as to keep their dumber than shit voters believing that the democrap party is an angstrom away from being a useful force in a shithole on the verge of a nazi reich. The lie could hardly be more obvious... to anyone with the capacity of independent thought.


And thanks to DWT…


Like
bottom of page