top of page
Search

Midnight Meme Of The Day! No, The Sex Abusers On The Court Will Not Recuse Themselves

  • Writer: Noah
    Noah
  • Aug 29
  • 2 min read
ree

by Noah


Ghislaine Maxwell, girlfriend and accomplice of Donald Trump's deceased best friend Jeffrey Epstein (She was also reportedly the best friend of Trump's late wife Ivana who "fell down the stairs" and died the day before she was due to give a deposition) is, as I write this on 8/11, still waiting on a response to her petition to overturn her New York sextrafficking conviction. Her lawyers, aka Trump's lawyers if we want to tell it like it is, are arguing that a 2007 plea agreement (a very lenient plea agreement) between Epstein and federal prosecutors in the sick joke banana republic state of Florida included a convenient provision that protected his co-conspirators from criminal charges. Trump's Maxwell team, which includes one of his personal attorneys (Todd Blanche) who is now the Deputy AG of the DOJ under another longtime Trump associate, US Attorney General Pam Bondi, aka the former Florida Attorney General, claims that that gets Ghislaine Maxwell off the hook since it amounts to a get out of jail free card. You can see where this is going: If the court tosses Maxwell's conviction, another Epstein co-conspirator could make the same claim. Obviously, there is a long game here. 


The Supreme Court is a jury unto itself, guided solely by the law, at least that is what they would have us think. In reality some of us know better. In the corrupt and horrible reality we live in, the Supreme Court is a jury picked and confirmed by people of either party who are owned and operated by Scumbag Billionaires to do their bidding no matter what it is. As Ghislaine Maxwell's sicko case arrives in their laps, at least two of her own predator kind will sit there in their black robes. I say at least two because, honestly, there's a good chance that one or two others sitting on the court doubtlessly have pertinent incidents in their pasts that we haven't heard about, yet; incidents that would bring knowing smiles to the likes of Kavanaugh and Thomas? Where there's one or two, there's always more. Smoke meet fire. Who else? My guess? I'd say that when Chief Justice John Roberts, right after Trump was back in office, very hurriedly pushed the court for a ruling that his master Donald Trump is immune and above the laws of the land when it comes to what are nebulously called "official acts," he was well aware that a day could and likely would come when his guy might need some Supreme Court assistance in a case involving previous or current non-official actions. If we suspected that day could or would come, there's no way Roberts didn't also think about it and there's no way he didn't see a good chance for a future expansion of that ruling. Tell us your secrets, Mr. Roberts. Ah, well, maybe the world has to wait 50 years until you're gone, buried and dead. I wish I could live long enough to find out. 

Comments


bottom of page