top of page

Biden's Postmaster General Is A Criminal And Should Have Been Fired Months Ago

Many people, particularly Democrats and independents, are wondering why Louis DeJoy, one of Trump's most toxic appointees, is still postmaster general almost half a year into Biden's presidency and still sabotaging the postal office from within. Washington Post reporters Matt Zapotosky and Jacob Bogage decided to take a look beyond that this afternoon and reported on an FBI investigation of DeJoy's swamp-like-- and criminal-- behavior, the very behavior that ingratiated him to Trump in the first place.

The basics of the FBI investigation is how DeJoy illegally raised money for Republican candidates, including Trump of course. In recent weeks FBI agents, wrote Zapotosky and Bogage, interviewed DeJoy's employees about his illegal donation tactics, and have finally issued a subpoena to DeJoy himself. DeJoy is already whining that he didn't knowingly break the law. Will Biden allow him to continue to run/ruin the post office after he's indicted? During a trial? After he's found guilty? From a prison cell? Does DeJoy have something on one of Biden's sleazy relatives?

The inquiries could signal impending legal peril for the controversial head of the nation’s mail service-- though DeJoy has not been charged with any crimes and has previously asserted that he and his company followed the law in their campaign fundraising activity.
...Democrats accused the prominent GOP fundraiser, who personally gave more than $1.1 million to the joint fundraising vehicle of President Donald Trump’s reelection campaign and the Republican Party, of trying to undermine his own organization because of Trump’s distrust of mail-in voting. Two Democratic lawmakers, Reps. Ted Lieu (D-CA) and Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) sent a letter to the FBI asking agents to investigate whether DeJoy or the Postal Service’s governing board “committed any crimes” in stalling mail.
...In early September, the Washington Post published an extensive examination of how employees at DeJoy’s former company, North Carolina-based New Breed Logistics, alleged they were pressured by DeJoy or his aides to attend political fundraisers or make contributions to Republican candidates, and then were paid back through bonuses.
Such reimbursements could run afoul of state or federal laws, which prohibit “straw-donor” schemes meant to allow wealthy donors to evade individual contribution limits and obscure the source of a candidate’s money. In April, though, Wake County, N.C., District Attorney Lorrin Freeman (D) said that she would not pursue an investigation of DeJoy and that the matter was better left to federal authorities.
DeJoy has adamantly disputed that he broke the law. Asked at a hearing in August by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN) if he had repaid executives for making donations to the Trump campaign, DeJoy responded: “That’s an outrageous claim, sir, and I resent it. . . . The answer is no.”
When The Post later published its report, Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) said the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, which she chairs, would begin an inquiry and asserted DeJoy may have lied to the panel under oath.
...Last year, five people who worked for New Breed Logistics told The Post that they were urged by DeJoy’s aides or by DeJoy himself to write checks and attend fundraisers at his mansion. Two employees said DeJoy would then instruct that bonus payments be boosted to help defray the cost of their contributions.
A Post analysis of federal and state campaign finance records found a pattern of extensive donations by New Breed employees to Republican candidates, with the same amount often given by multiple people on the same day. Between 2000 and 2014, 124 individuals who worked for the company together gave more than $1 million to federal and state GOP candidates. Many had not previously made political donations, according to The Post’s analysis.
“He would ask employees to make contributions at the same time that he would say, ‘I’ll get it back to you down the road,’ ” one former employee, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told The Post last year.
At the time of The Post’s report Monty Hagler, a DeJoy spokesman, said DeJoy was not aware that any employees had felt pressured to make donations and “believes that he has always followed campaign fundraising laws and regulations.” Hagler said DeJoy “sought and received legal advice” from a former general counsel for the Federal Election Commission “to ensure that he, New Breed Logistics and any person affiliated with New Breed fully complied with any and all laws.”
The federal law banning straw-donor schemes has a five-year statute of limitations, which could complicate a possible criminal case. The former employees who spoke to The Post last year described donations they gave between 2003 and 2014, the year when New Breed was acquired by a Connecticut-based company called XPO Logistics.
DeJoy remained at XPO briefly in an executive role and retired at the end of 2015-- though he was then appointed to the company’s board of directors, where he served until 2018.
In the wake of The Post’s report, the Campaign Legal Center, an advocacy organization, filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission alleging that suspicious donation activity continued after New Breed’s acquisition. A Federal Election Commission spokesman confirmed the commission had received the complaint but declined to comment further.
Between 2015 and 2018, the group alleged, campaign finance records showed “several instances of XPO employees contributing to the same candidate or committee, during the same period of time, and often in similar amounts,” and that “DeJoy family members, including DeJoy’s college-aged children, also made contributions on the same day or in the same period as those employees.”
“Between 2015 and 2018, XPO Logistics employees and DeJoy family members following this pattern together gave over $150,000 to the same candidates and committees, including over $50,000 to Trump Victory, President Donald Trump’s joint fundraising committee,” the group alleged.


1 commentaire

04 juin 2021

PAEA is the bill that started the destruction of the USPS, toward a neoliberal takeover of all mail. Its intent was to force the USPS to go broke by forcing it to prefund pensions for 75 years, in effect forcing it to fund pensions for employees a decade or more before they are born. In a neoliberal shithole where pensions are anachronisms, this requirement is a poison pill. I guarantee that when, not if, the USPS is replaced by a corporation, they will NOT provide a pension program for anyone.

It passed by voice vote in the house and by unanimous consent in the senate, so individual votes placing fingerprints on it are not available. But suffice it to sa…

bottom of page